You’ll be seeing but not hearing more of Tape Face later this summer in the live episodes coming to NBC.
Tape face judge cuts pdf#
Website of World Cube Association: Original source of the WCA Regulations: WCA Regulations in PDF formatĭevelopment of the WCA Regulations and Guidelines is public on GitHub and the discussion is public on the WCA Forum.įor questions and feedback, please contact the WCA Regulations Committee (WRC). Tape Face returned to impress the judges on America’s Got Talent, and even get one of them Howie Mandel into the act. Uses of the words "must", "must not", "should", "should not" and "may" match RFC 2119. The Regulations should be considered a complete document, but the Guidelines contain additional clarifications and explanations. The WCA Regulations are also supplemented by the WCA Guidelines.
Tape face judge cuts full#
The WCA Regulations contain the full set of Regulations that apply to all official competitions sanctioned by the World Cube Association. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.Version: Febru Notes WCA Regulations and Guidelines This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. The indictment instead charges Trump with Espionage Act violations, as prosecutors argue the documents he kept could harm the country if obtained by adversaries. In either case, Super said, any discussion about the Presidential Records Act is “largely a red herring” because Trump doesn’t face charges of violating that law. “In contrast, the documents that Trump kept were all presidential records from the moment they arrived at the Oval Office from other parts of the government.”Įric Freedman, a professor at Hofstra University’s School of Law in Hempstead, New York, also noted that a federal appeals court has already rejected similar arguments raised by Trump’s legal team as it sought to block the criminal investigation into the records found at Mar-a-Lago. “The Clinton materials were audiotapes of conversations with an historian that incidentally recorded some calls on official business,” he wrote. Margulies, of Roger Williams University, said the claim “mixes apples and oranges.” Legal experts this week also dismissed those arguments. Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign didn’t respond to an email seeking comment, but the Republican and his allies have argued that the judge’s ruling in the case showed that the Presidential Records Act affords presidents complete discretion to delineate between personal and presidential records.
Jackson simply ruled that NARA could not turn over the tapes as public records because they were owned by the historian and not government property. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ultimately dismissed the case, ruling NARA didn’t have the authority to seize the records from Clinton and hand them over.ĭavid Super, another professor at Georgetown Law, argues the 2012 Clinton case has “absolutely nothing to do with” the charges Trump currently faces.įor one thing, the court didn’t dismiss the case because it found that Clinton was entitled to keep the tapes, Super said. based organization had argued the audiotapes were “presidential records” that the agency should provide under the federal public records law, but U.S. “There is no way to read that statutory language as giving the president ‘discretion’ to categorize military plans, to take just one example, as ‘personal’,” Chafetz wrote in an email. Prosecutors allege, for example, that Trump showed off a classified map of a foreign country while discussing a military operation. Josh Chafetz, a professor at Georgetown Law, agreed, saying there’s “simply no way” the records described in the indictment against Trump could be considered “personal” under the act’s definitions.Īmong the documents found at Mar-a-Lago were ones marked “SECRET” or “TOP SECRET.” The documents included details about the country’s nuclear weapons and the nuclear capabilities and military activities of other countries. “Any record that touches on information relevant to presidential decisions on foreign policy or national security is a presidential record. “The definition of ‘personal records’ is narrow, clear, and functional: it includes only records of a ‘purely private or nonpublic character’,” Peter Margulies, a professor at Roger Williams University’s School of Law in Bristol, Rhode Island, wrote in an email.
0 kommentar(er)
